The Division: The Aftermath
- X Division: Illinois, Indiana, Ohio State, Penn State, Purdue, Wisconsin
- O Division: Iowa, Michigan, Michigan State, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nerdwestern
Aware of the sensitivity regarding the split, especially of Ohio State and Michigan, the Big Ten announced there would be a protective cross-over game in a manner similar to the SEC’s guaranteed inter-divisional matchups (Auburn-Georgia, Alabama-Tennessee, LSU-Florida) and so on. These are:
- Illinois-Nerdwestern
- Indiana-Michigan State
- Ohio State-Michigan
- Penn State-Nebraska
- Purdue-Iowa
- Wisconsin-Minnesota
Off the bat, Ohio State and Michigan fans were assured that The Game will keep its usual spot at the end of the schedule. Several thoughts follow.
- RELAX EVERYONE. Just CHILL. They protected Indiana-Michigan State’s historic grudge match for the Old Brass Spittoon. I was worried there. We all were. Let the healing begin.
- I’m glad they also protected Purdue-Iowa. You know, two teams without any extended interaction with each other.
- Penn State-Nebraska as an annual occurrence is intriguing and a neat little surprise of the divisions. These two tradition laden programs have a history of 13 games with each other.
- Looking a little further, I wonder how happy Penn State fans are with this overall. Their fanbase was rightly concerned about becoming an island in a western alignment. Instead, they get to trek to Lincoln, Nebraska every other year, get Wisconsin and Illinois in their division and still have to play two other teams out west. That is still fairly punitive, though I think any arrangement was going to have their fans pack their bags and prepare for a long trip somewhere. Penn State is very isolated from the rest of the conference. There was no way to hide it. At least Big Ten fans get Penn State-Nebraska every year.
- This arrangement makes The Little Brown Jug (Minnesota-Michigan) and Illibuck (Illinois-Ohio State) now yearly occurrences. As if anyone gives a shit. Seriously, I do not care the slightest bit about that stupid turtle we play for. Illinois can keep it. Play with it if you want. Not like I care. I just want the win when we do play. The Little Brown Jug is a little more important in terms of historical context for both schools. However, Bo Schembechler singlehandedly killed that rivalry. The Gophers have won 3 times since Bo Schembechler took over at Michigan in 1969. Unlike the Illibuck, though, I think both sides care a little more about it. You don’t have any Illibuck restaurants in Columbus like you do a Little Brown Jug restaurant in Ann Arbor. All told: that is now an annual occurrence while Wisconsin gets taken away from Iowa and its desired yearly matchup with Nebraska? I’m not sure that’s worth it.
But really, though, I am expecting Jim Delany to host his next teleconference by saying Cash Rules Everything Around Me and that the new divisions will be named “Barbasol” and “RO*TEL”. Delany also talked about having divisional trophies (please, don’t). If so, the winner of the Barbasol Division gets a big ol’ can of shaving cream.
I do want to delve into the “competitive equality” thing further. Delany kept repeating it over and over through this process as if he knew what he was doing. Heads up: you don’t. You never know. You can not forecast into the future and know with certainty that the competitively equal divisions outlined now will hold into the future. Consider it an exercise of finding out “What’s in the box?” You don’t know what’s in the box and you can’t open it, but you have to guess. You can shake it, weigh it and so on, but you will never know for sure. Looking from 1960 to 1967, would you have guessed Michigan and Ohio State would make the conference uncompetitive through the 1970s? Looking at the 1970s, you may have guessed that Michigan would go to 5 Rose Bowls from the 1980 to 1989 seasons. Seems to be a reasonable extrapolation. Would you have guessed that Ohio State would only go once? You may not have expected that Iowa would go twice and Illinois once. In 2004, would you have guessed that Michigan would be struggling as bad as they are now? You can come up with metrics to guess (weighing, shaking), but you still don’t know and you never will. Remember: Sovietologists, the CIA experts and diplomats (many having PhDs, years of research and expertise) associated with tracking the trajectory of the Soviet Union, could not look into the future and see the events of the late 1980s unfolding. And somehow you can? Don’t kid yourself.
I think splitting Ohio State-Michigan, but keeping it at the end of the season, was the compromise to turn the reaction from Ohio State and Michigan fans against itself. An objection about moving The Game, as Delany freely admitted to considering1, was that it would be hijacking an institution in the once-in-a-decade probability that a rematch may occur in the Big Ten championship game. Splitting Ohio State and Michigan, but keeping the game at the end of the season, may have been a way to call that bluff. The Game remains where it is and, if Ohio State and Michigan fans are right, it will be played twice approximately one out of every ten trials. Neither side gets what it truly wants.
Ultimately, it reflects uncertainty from Delany and company about the nature of the product. If you are secure in the product, you should not have to rig the divisions to make an Ohio State-Michigan rematch possible. If neither Ohio State nor Michigan appears in it for the next 20 years2, it should still pack seats because it’s the Big Ten Championship game. This is not the ACC; Midwesterners care about the sport. There are no Boston Colleges or Dukes. Even if Indiana, decidedly neutral on football, makes it to the finale, it would still put people in seats. This alignment is as much about “competitive equality” as it is a prayer to God, begging “Oh God, please don’t let Minnesota or Northwestern get in.”
I am still not crazy about these divisions. Divisions should not have to be gerrymandered in order to produce specific outcomes. Rather than try to neutralize “the Big Four”, you would want to encourage everyone else to commit even further to the sport. But with some of the other hare-brained things being discussed, I guess I should be grateful that the Big Ten divisions and format are what they are.
2011, 2012 Schedules Announced
With the new divisions, the Big Ten also announced the new schedules. I give Ohio State’s 2011 and 2012 schedules below. Thoughts follow.
| 2011/2012 Season | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date | Opponent | Venue | Date | Opponent | Venue |
| 09/03/11 | Akron | Ohio Stadium | 09/01/12 | Miami (Ohio) | Ohio Stadium |
| 09/10/11 | Toledo | Ohio Stadium | 09/08/12 | Cincinnati | Ohio Stadium |
| 09/17/11 | Miami (Florida) | Sun Life Stadium | 09/15/12 | California | Ohio Stadium |
| 09/24/11 | Colorado | Ohio Stadium | 09/22/12 | Alabama-Birmingham | Ohio Stadium |
| 10/01/11 | Michigan State | Ohio Stadium | 09/29/12 | Michigan State | Spartan Stadium |
| 10/08/11 | Nebraska | Memorial Stadium | 10/06/12 | Nebraska | Ohio Stadium |
| 10/15/11 | Illinois | Memorial Stadium | 10/13/12 | Indiana | Memorial Stadium |
| 10/22/11 | 10/20/12 | Purdue | Ohio Stadium | ||
| 10/29/11 | Wisconsin | Ohio Stadium | 10/27/12 | Penn State | Beaver Stadium |
| 11/05/11 | Indiana | Ohio Stadium | 11/03/12 | Illinois | Ohio Stadium |
| 11/12/11 | Purdue | Ross-Ade Stadium | 11/10/12 | ||
| 11/19/11 | Penn State | Ohio Stadium | 11/17/12 | Wisconsin | Camp Randall |
| 11/26/11 | TTUN | The Hole in the Ground | 11/24/12 | TTUN | Ohio Stadium |
On Twitter, I fearlessly predicted that Ohio State and Nebraska would be playing in 2011 and that it would become a talking point afterward. I got the first part right, but did not have the patience to listen to DiNardo any longer than what was required. Pelini’s Cornhuskers make the return trip to Ohio State in 2012.
Coincidentally, Ohio State’s 2011 and 2012 Big Ten opener remained the same: Michigan State.
By a fluke, Ohio State will host Penn State in 2011. The Buckeyes have hosted the Nittany Lions in every even-numbered year since 1996. Consider this retribution for having to go on the road to play them in 1994 and 1995. Fortunately, the 1994 game never happened. I don’t like to discuss things that decidedly did not happen ever on this blog. End of discussion.
Nerdwestern ducked Ohio State for another two years, making it four years since the Buckeyes have given the Nerds the rightful wedgies they deserve. They will be getting wedgies of the atomic variety should they cross paths in 2013.
Elsewhere
I am intrigued that Penn State and Nebraska will be playing yearly and that Iowa-Nebraska will be a regular season-ender. This is the right way to go. Their games will be enjoyable.
Penn State fans are probably rejoicing that they are free of their obligations to play Michigan State.
Nebraska’s Big Ten opener in 2011 and 2012 is against Wisconsin, starting in Madison. I smell Alvarez.


Nice write up…perhaps the most insightful take I’ve read tonight. However, I must argue as a former Sovietologist (really..we were numerous in Derby Hall at one point)… most of us knew that the USSR wouldn’t survive the 1980s…Kissinger predicted it in Mershon in 1987….that was a MUCH easier prediction than guessing what the competitive balance in the next decade might be…
“There is no Pravda in Izvestia, and there is no Izvestia in Pravda”…could be a starting point for a new slogan for Delany’s office. Lenin claimed that capitalists would sell you the rope to hang them with. I think Delany has a “rope for sale” sign hanging from the B10 offices.
Good stuff Vico. Again, what is Delany’s best case scenario with ohio state and michigan? Is it that both teams are great going into that final game and it comes down to a last minute score and then both teams rematch the next week? I just don’t get it…I don’t really get the rest of the country being jacked to see a rematch of a game that literally happened the week prior.
What if both teams have clinched a spot in the big10 title, then doesn’t that regular season game mean little? Or what if one team has clinched a spot, and the other has already been eliminated, then who the hell cares?
I’m just mostly concerned that there’s no good way to potentially have these teams turn around and play again where there’s still intrigue and something left to be gained without the other team just simply playing the role of the spoiler. And I agree, the only reason they are in separate divisions is so they could potentially rematch…which I think is playing with fire…
Just when you think Jim Delaney is a bright guy, he goes and does something like this. Then again, he has been chasing the domers for a long time for uknown reasons to me.
re: illibuck: OSU has one rival and a bunch of people who want us to store their trophies. I’m including PSU in that group, though so far we’ve been successful telling them to just use a rental unit somewhere.
I could gripe about whether I think the division is balanced or wishful thinking, but I honestly don’t believe even the 2012 season will survive as listed, and if we haven’t added another team by 2013 I’ll be flat out shocked. I’ll worry about who’s with who once the REAL final version comes out.
That said, I wonder why Nebraska gets to run the gauntlet for a welcome while PSU got a soft landing. I’m sure the premier teams are itching to play them, and it’ll be some good football, but it seems a bit of a double standard.
Thanks for a non-cataclysmic look at this stuff.
If you look at the competitive balance issue from a slightly longer term perspective than say just the past 10 years or so then the move of either UM or OSU to the West makes sense.
On a 40 year basis (1970 to present) the indy/illi border divide would be horribly skewed to the east with OSU UM and PSU ranking 2nd, 4th and 6th nationally in wins, with Only Nebraska in the west at better than 45th in the west (Wisky 45, Iowa 47, Illinois 79, Minny 82, NW 107)
on a 30 year basis not much changes (OSU, UM, PSU 6th 7th and 8th, with Iowa 27th and Wisky 37th)
on a 20 year basis (OSU 2nd, UM 9th, PSU 11th, with Wisky 21 and Iowa 38th),,so moving UM in exchange for Wisky makes sense,,,MSU moving seems like a back room deal in exchange for Illinois, ie not much difference but MSU/UM may have demanded they be in the same side
hence form a 20+ year perspective they did achieve competitive balance without having to place the by far farthest east team (PSU) in the west
no other move would have better balanced the ledger.
I do think announcing it without having the names ready is a mistake, but given what the goal was no other alignment works better